This post is meant to go out to all the 55 + players. It's gotten to a point where our 55 + division is becoming a complete Fiasco!!! Reason being.. John Reel, from what I've been told today is allowing waivers now for players as young as 52,53.. I for one am speaking up, and I know ton's of other's are not happy, and not only my Yankees club... but I'll gather most will be silent due to the fact of fearing discipline....!!!! Well, it's time to speak up, at least from my prospective. John, you are allowing 3 players (talented one's)which I won't name, that are easily under age (2 -3 years) on your 55 Marlins club. John, I'm sorry, it's getting a bit out of hand now, as you make rulings that are not thought out well, plus you don't involve all of the managers ahead of time before you make such a ruling that is completely not in the 55's best interest. I don't care if a team is successful or not, it's the fact that you just can't make a ruling based on what's best for your present club it seems, and many others are realizing this now. I would like all 55 + players to realize this is happening, and everyone needs to be heard. John, what I find interesting, is that my 55 Yankees club has constantly been denied ( just 1 year under age..) waiver players for at least 4-5 years...., You did the same thing to my 45 Yankees club some years back, not allowing one waiver player... and for the life of me, I can't understand why. That same year, you allowed at least 8-9 under 45 players to participate in the 45's with other clubs... So, my estimate our Yankees club's request for a waiver player was 0-8!!!! As it was, our Yankees 55 club only held a .500 record for the 2014 season. For the most part, our 55 division is mainly comprised of guys I would safely say are 58 and up. So, I would think you can find reason to understand what is happening now???? If you want to, why don't you add a 50+ League... which would allow those under 55 yr. old players...... Or, why don't you bring in a number of those 2-3 years younger guys and sprinkle them around the league.. and just give EACH team 2 under aged players... no younger than 3 years... Let's address this... make it open for all 55 teams.. I know, as for myself at 63 in May, and many other's over 60 will have to now compete against guys 8 years younger.... Where does it stop John???? If this is grounds for discipline, so be it... I'm a paying player, and have played in the league for 10 years now since I was 52, when I started playing in the 45's.... I'm just stating facts, no false statements here.. Plus, as I mentioned previously, ton's of players will stay silent. I truly feel this ruling needs to be brought to the attention of the whole 55 division, and have the players vote on it... Let's do it fairly John!!!! I do respect the hard work you've given our league's John, and I know your passion for the game. But, this ruling is something I and many other's don't feel comfortable with...
My only suggestion Mike, is that you take things like this up with John himself before blurting it out here. You may find out that your interpretation of John's intention for making any decision might be different from what you think. Anyways, I suggest picking up a phone and having the conversation with John first, then if you are not satisfied with the answer, post here. Just sayin.
Mike,
relax brother.it doesn't matter if they bring up the whole league and let them play in the 55 division. Let's not lose sight of the fact we are all here because we love to play baseball.I think it was Truman who said "if you can't stand the heat----"Besides I plan on coming back and pitch .I look forward to facing the great players we have in the division.in my opinion,if you are in this div., you have probably been around this league for awhile,and hopefully can get to the point where all the drama becomes unnecessary.
P.S.-- I also am hoping to play with the darn yanks. Last time I checked , there wasn't a team in that div. that can beat me.
P.SS.- It ain't braggin' when you can do it.
I like and respect John Reel. He's a great guy who has done so much to make CDMSBL possible. I do not know what, if anything, is going on regarding allowing players younger than 55 to play in the 55 and older program. However, I do have some thoughts on the issue and am certainly not in favor of it. There are leagues available to those who are under 55. Players who are under 55 can play in any or all of the several leagues in CDMSBL offered to those who have not yet reached age 55.That's fair enough. If the idea to allow players under age 55 to play in the 55+ league is to help make a team more competitive, I am against it. Everybody wants to play. There are teams that are a lot weaker than others. We saw the same thing in high school and college. It happens all the time. But, if a strong team does not want to play a weak team, then let them not play the weak team and accept a forfeit. Everybody who is in the league wants to play. At this point, we are doing it more for fun and not because we have something to prove. I would think by now we have figured that out. How many of our friends are already in the ground ? I am happy to still be able to run down a fly ball. Happy to fall down and be able to get up again. Happy to savor every game now. Happy to spend a couple of hours with great teammates. There will be enough competitive games in the course of the season of all of the stronger teams to be seriously challenged. This is still a kids game and we have come full circle fellows.
As a former "waiver" player and current "age appropriate" member of the 55+ division, I wanted to chime in. I joined the Peppers two years ago as a 54 year old. During that season the Peppers and Hawks were allowed waiver players. I recall that this was allowed a) to make these teams a bit more competitive and b) because these teams were having trouble fielding a full team. John Reel was very involved with the decision to issue waivers back in 2013. I also had personal conversations with John regarding some managers' concerns over allowing underage players in the 55+ division.
I share my experience primarily to point out that John has not introduced the issuing waivers solely for the benefit of his Marlins team. The policy was followed for the benefit of other teams in our division. While it seems strange to think of the Marlins as a team that needs this type of help, I support their use of waiver players if it helps them to field a competitive team.
And if discussions about playing baseball means that we are almost done with sub-zero windchills, then I support that as well!
The only way around it is to have two leagues, one for those whose ability is greater and one for those whose isn't. In Palm Springs they have a softball league where they have an A division and a B division, the A having more skilled players. Age is not a factor, ability is. You can say you can have a lot of fun and not be competitive and that's true to a point, but there is nothing like competing in games that mean something against players of your own caliber. That is what most of us that love the game live for.
The only way around it is to have two leagues, one for those whose ability is greater and one for those whose isn't. In Palm Springs they have a softball league where they have an A division and a B division, the A having more skilled players. Age is not a factor, ability is. You can say you can have a lot of fun and not be competitive and that's true to a point, but there is nothing like competing in games that mean something against players of your own caliber. That is what most of us that love the game live for.
don ball's right: the three waivers the peppers got last year helped us stay competitive but they didn't get us a championship. jim porter made much the same point about his whiz team. so waivers helped improve two teams, they helped avoid blowouts, which means they made the whole league better.
the waivers john granted to the hawks also kept that team afloat. in part because of them, the team is coming back this year, apparently as the twins.
john could have granted waivers to his own marlins team last year. the team could have used them, but he didn't. he didn't want to look like he was playing favorites. but from last year's play, it's clear that the marlins deserve waivers this year.
we're not talking about adding 45-year-olds here. i think mainly we're talking adding healthy bodies - getting enough players to fill out rosters. in some cases, that might mean adding one 53-year-old. but, so far, it's been done judiciously; it doesn't mean adding five 52-year-olds. virtually every manager (and logic) will tell you that it's really hard to find guys over 55 who can still play ball; in fact, who can still run and chew gum.
for the record, the peppers have asked for one waiver this year and it's for that reason, to add one player. we have 15 players now, and i'd prefer to enter the season with 16 - principally to avoid forfeits. rosters below 16 frighten me. so we've heard we may have one waiver. don mccann, who turns 54 this summer, is our hoped-for player.
i understand mike epilite's uneasiness. but i echo mike girard: john reel has been as fair- and broad-minded person as i've met in this league, and i'm sure that if mike epilite, or anybody else, has concerns about any issue, that john will hear them out and discuss things fairly. give him a try. or two, if the first talk didn't settle the issue.
let's be patient. let's see how the waivers work this summer. if they don't, if there are issues, then next fall, let's consider wayne's idea and any others. the 55 division is still, in a way, new, and, given pressures of players rising from the 45s, it's still growing.
if we need minor adjustments now, ok, fine, tighten a few screws. but mainly let's go easy, one step at a time. let's trust each other. we can do it.
-mike
-- Edited by mhart on Friday 27th of February 2015 03:14:18 PM
And if the 55+ is not competitive or challenging enough for some, there is the option to play in the 45's, or even younger. Why not ?
One more thought---- If some 55+ teams are falling short on attracting enough players, then another option could be to allow a 55+ player to roster on two teams, and if he is a pitcher, have a limitation on the number of innings he can throw per week. The other details such as playoffs can be worked out.
-- Edited by crowbait on Friday 27th of February 2015 07:41:25 PM
-- Edited by crowbait on Saturday 28th of February 2015 08:02:18 AM